The Reminder That Treats Everyone the Same
Arrears chasing works because it escalates — a nudge, then a letter, then a call, then something formal. An automated reminder on a single organization-wide cadence sends the nudge, forever, to everybody. What that is good for, and what it cannot replace.
Every agency knows the arrears ladder even if nobody has written it down. Three days late is an oversight and gets a text. Two weeks is a pattern and gets a phone call. Six weeks is a problem and gets a letter with a date in it. Three months is a decision, and somebody senior makes it.
The ladder works because each rung means something. A tenant who receives the six-week letter knows they have passed the point where a text would have done, and that knowledge is most of what makes them pay.
Automated reminders are frequently sold as replacing that ladder. They do not. Understanding precisely what they do replace is the difference between a useful piece of automation and a monthly email that everybody has learned to ignore.
What the automated reminder does
It is a narrow mechanism and worth describing exactly, because the narrowness is the whole of the analysis.
-
A job runs every morning
It looks for invoices with a balance still outstanding, not paid, not cancelled, and past their due date.
-
It checks whether reminders are switched on
A setting per organization, so this is opt-in rather than something that starts happening to your tenants without a decision.
-
It checks whether the cadence is due
Daily, weekly, monthly, or a custom number of days. If the last run was inside that interval, today does nothing.
-
It emails every customer with an overdue invoice
One pass, everyone who qualifies. A customer with no email address on record is skipped silently.
-
It stamps the cadence only if something went out
A day with no overdue invoices does not consume the interval, so a quiet week does not delay the first real reminder.
That last detail is a small piece of care worth noticing: without it, a fortnightly cadence could burn its interval on a day when there was nothing to send, and the first genuine reminder would arrive two weeks later than intended.
The cadence belongs to your organization, not to the debt. One interval governs every tenant, whether they are three days late or three months.
The single cadence, and what it means
This is the property worth understanding before you decide how much weight to put on the feature. The interval is set once per organization for this kind of notification. It is not set per invoice, per customer, or per how far overdue the debt is.
So a weekly cadence means: once a week, everybody with anything overdue receives a reminder. The tenant who was three days late and has since paid receives nothing, correctly. The tenant three days late today and the one ninety days late both receive the same message, on the same morning, with the same tone.
There is no ladder. There is one rung, repeated.
What one repeated rung is genuinely good at
It removes the excuse. The single largest category of late payment in residential property is not inability or unwillingness — it is that the tenant forgot, and nothing reminded them until somebody had time to make a call. An automatic weekly nudge eliminates that entire category without consuming any of your staff time, and for most portfolios that is the bulk of the arrears by count, if not by value.
What it is not good at is everything above that first rung. A tenant ninety days down is not going to be moved by the same email they ignored twelve times, and continuing to send it is worse than sending nothing, because it teaches them that your process has no next step.
What AWRA OpsHub does today
- A daily job that finds invoices with a balance outstanding, unpaid, uncancelled and past due.
- A cadence you set — daily, weekly, monthly or a custom number of days — so tenants are not emailed every morning.
- Opt-in per organization, so reminders do not start reaching your tenants without a decision.
- The interval is only consumed when something actually goes out, so a quiet period does not delay the first real reminder.
- A separate internal digest exists for your own staff, distinct from what reaches the customer.
What it does not do
- No escalation ladder. The cadence is per organization, not per debt, so a tenant three days late and one ninety days late receive the same message on the same day. Sequenced messages that change with age are not configurable.
- No per-customer cadence. A tenant you have agreed a payment plan with receives the same reminder as everybody else, on the same schedule, unless you switch reminders off entirely.
- Customers without an email address are skipped silently. No SMS fallback and no report of who was missed — which in a residential portfolio can be a large proportion of the tenants who most need chasing.
- No record on the invoice of who was reminded and when. The cadence stamp is per organization, so the invoice itself does not carry its own chasing history.
Not ours, by choice
- We will not send reminders by default. Automated contact with your tenants is a decision an agency makes deliberately, and a system that starts emailing debtors because a setting shipped enabled would be making that decision for you.
- We will not write threatening copy on your behalf. What a demand says, and at what point it says it, carries legal weight in a tenancy — that is your letter and your judgement, not a template we should be supplying.
An escalation ladder keyed on days overdue, per-customer suppression for agreed payment plans, an SMS channel, and a chasing history recorded against each invoice, are all scope rather than ceilings. The scheduled job, the notification settings model, the SMS gateway and the cadence machinery all exist and work.
The missing-email skip is the one to check on day one. Run your customer list and count how many have no email address, because those tenants receive nothing, are not reported anywhere, and are disproportionately the ones your arrears are concentrated in.
Building the ladder around it
The practical approach is to let the automation own the first rung completely and to run the rest deliberately, because the rest is where judgement lives anyway.
| Age | Rung | Who does it |
|---|---|---|
| 1–14 days | Automatic reminder on your cadence | The system, with no staff time |
| 15–30 days | A phone call from a named person | You, from the aged receivables report |
| 31–60 days | A written demand with a date in it | You, and it should say something different |
| 60 days and beyond | A decision, taken by somebody senior | You, and the decision should be recorded |
Set the cadence to weekly rather than daily. Daily reminders on the first rung train tenants to filter your address, which costs you the rung entirely — and once a sender is filtered, the rung is gone for the tenants who were going to respond to it as well as the ones who were not.
Running the rungs the system does not
- Pull the aged receivables report on a fixed day each week rather than when somebody remembers. The consistency is what makes the ladder mean something.
- Work the fifteen-to-thirty band first, not the oldest. That band is where a call still changes the outcome; the ninety-day band mostly needs a decision rather than another contact.
- Record the call in the tenant record, since the invoice does not carry its own chasing history. Otherwise the next person starts from nothing.
- Check the no-email list monthly and chase those tenants by another route — they are receiving nothing at all.
- Suppress reminders for tenants on an agreed payment plan by agreeing the plan and then switching them off, because there is no per-customer suppression.
- Review anything past sixty days as a portfolio rather than one at a time. Patterns by building, by unit type or by move-in cohort are visible in aggregate and invisible one tenant at a time.
The fifth item is the awkward one, because switching a customer off means switching their reminders off entirely rather than pausing them, and switching them back on is a thing somebody has to remember. Note the date the plan ends somewhere you will see it.
Why the first rung is worth automating at all
It would be reasonable to ask whether a single repeated nudge earns its place. It does, and the argument is about consistency rather than about the message.
A manual first rung is applied when somebody has time. In practice that means it is applied in the first week of the month and not in the third, applied to tenants whose names are familiar and not to the ones nobody has met, and stops entirely whenever the person who does it is on leave. Arrears then grow in the gaps, and the gaps are invisible because nobody is tracking the reminders that were not sent.
An automated rung is applied identically to everybody, every week, whoever is on leave. That is a materially different property from being applied well, and for a first reminder it is the more valuable of the two.
The collection mechanics are in rent and service-charge collection, the trust-money discipline in deposits and landlord funds, and the reporting that keeps the mandate in owner statements and payouts.
Our take
Switch it on, set it to weekly, and let it own the first fourteen days completely — that band is mostly people who forgot, and removing that category without spending staff time is the whole return. Then run the rest of the ladder yourself from the aged receivables report on a fixed day, because there is no escalation: one cadence governs every debtor regardless of age. And count how many of your tenants have no email address on record before you rely on any of it, because they receive nothing and nothing reports that they were missed.
See arrears chasing that runs itself
A daily job over genuinely overdue invoices, a cadence you set rather than a daily barrage, opt-in per organization, and an aged receivables view for the rungs a person still has to work.
Explore receivablesFrequently asked questions
How often are reminders sent?
On a cadence you set — daily, weekly, monthly, or a custom number of days. A job runs each morning, checks whether reminders are enabled and whether the interval has elapsed, and if so emails every customer holding an overdue invoice. The interval is only consumed when something actually goes out, so a quiet period does not push the first real reminder later. Weekly is the right default; daily trains tenants to filter your address, and a filtered sender costs you the rung entirely.
Do reminders escalate as the debt gets older?
No. The cadence belongs to your organization rather than to the debt, so a tenant three days late and one ninety days late receive the same message on the same morning. There is one rung, repeated. That is genuinely useful for the first fortnight — most late payment is people who forgot — and it is not a substitute for the ladder above it. Run the fifteen-day call and the thirty-day demand yourself from the aged receivables report.
What about tenants with no email address?
They are skipped, silently, with no SMS fallback and no report of who was missed. In a residential portfolio that can be a large share of the tenants, and they are frequently the ones your arrears are concentrated in. Count them before you rely on the automation at all — run your customer list, count the blanks, and set up another route for those tenants, because at present they receive nothing and nothing tells you so.
Can we stop reminders for a tenant on a payment plan?
Only by switching reminders off for them entirely, since there is no per-customer suppression or pause. That works, and it puts the burden on you to switch them back on when the plan ends — which nothing will remind you to do. Note the plan's end date somewhere you actually look. It is worth the small nuisance: a tenant who has agreed a plan and then keeps receiving standard chasing emails reasonably concludes that the agreement means nothing.
Does the invoice show who was reminded and when?
No. The cadence stamp is recorded per organization rather than per invoice, so an individual invoice does not carry its own chasing history. That matters when a person picks up a debt that somebody else was working — record calls and letters in the tenant record so the next person starts from something rather than from nothing, and so a tribunal or a landlord asking what you did has an answer.
Is an automated nudge really worth it if it never escalates?
Yes, for a reason that is about consistency rather than persuasion. A manual first reminder is sent when somebody has time — the first week of the month rather than the third, to tenants whose names are familiar, and not at all while that person is on leave. Arrears grow in those gaps and the gaps are invisible, because nobody tracks the reminders that were not sent. An automatic rung reaches everybody identically every week regardless of who is away, and for a first contact that property is worth more than being well written.
