Ask AwraIQ about features, pricing, onboarding, login, integrations, security, demos, mobile apps, automation, reports, or support.
For churches & faith organizations
Offerings counted and reconciled under proper controls, building and project funds tracked to the shilling, procurement governed, and reports the leadership and members can trust — the financial backbone of a well-run church.
If any of these ring true, you are exactly who this was built for.
Offerings collected, counted, and banked by good people with no dual controls — leaving both the money and the counters unprotected if anyone ever asks.
Members pledge and give toward a project, but no one can show exactly how much came in, what was spent, and what remains.
Purchases made by whoever was available, at whatever price — with the congregation's money and no approval on record.
Annual figures presented from a spreadsheet only the treasurer understands — accurate or not, impossible for anyone else to verify.
Each capability links to a deeper feature tour.
Every collection recorded by service and type, counted under dual control, and reconciled to what was banked — the money and the counters both protected.
Restricted funds for building or missions tracked separately, pledges against receipts, and a balance you can show at any meeting.
Requests and approvals before the congregation's money is committed — thresholds enforced, quotes on record, spending decided deliberately.
Sound equipment, instruments, vehicles, land, and buildings on a register with custodians and verification — not rebought or quietly lost.
Pastors and support staff paid with PAYE, NSSF, and SHIF handled correctly and on record.
Income, fund positions, and spend against budget in reports the board and members can read and trust — generated, not hand-typed.
Record collections by service, count under dual control, reconcile to banking — the discipline that protects the money and the people who handle it.
Building and mission funds tracked separately, pledges against receipts — a position you can present at any members' meeting.
Procurement approvals, an asset register, and transparent reporting — the full financial backbone, on the record.
A church runs on the trust of those who give to it — and trust in money matters is built by controls, not intentions. How well-run churches handle offerings, project funds, buying, and assets.
The offering is the hardest money to handle: cash, collected in trust, counted by volunteers. Getting it right protects the money, the counters, and the confidence of everyone who gives.
When members give toward a building, the money carries a promise. Pledges against receipts, restricted from general funds, spent transparently — how the promise is kept to completion.
Questions we are asked here
No, and we say so plainly. AWRA is the financial and operations backbone — offerings, funds, procurement, assets, payroll, and reporting. It does not manage membership rolls, attendance, or pastoral records; dedicated church-management tools do that. Most churches run a membership tool for people and AWRA for money and operations, and the two coexist.
By building dual control into the counting and reconciliation: collections are recorded by service and counted by more than one person, then reconciled to what was banked, with every step attributed. That protects the funds from loss and — just as importantly — protects honest counters and treasurers, because the record clears them rather than leaving them exposed to suspicion.
Received and spent, yes — and it is worth knowing exactly how, because two words in that question are not product features. A building fund is **modelled as a project**: receipts are coded to it as they come in, every disbursement is attributed to it with a document attached, and the report shows what came in, what went out and what remains. That is the number you present at a meeting and it is solid. What does not exist is a **fund entity** — nothing structurally prevents a receipt being coded to the wrong project, so the discipline is yours and the system records it faithfully rather than enforcing it. And there is **no pledge record**: a pledge is not an object here, so pledged-versus-received is only available if you raise each pledge as an invoice against the member, which works and is more administration than most congregations want. If the pledge side is the reason you are buying, weigh that before you do.
Yes — smaller churches benefit most, because they rarely have a finance office and rely on volunteers whom good controls protect. Start with offering recording and reconciliation, which delivers trust and protection immediately, and add fund tracking, procurement, and assets as capacity allows.
See offerings recorded and reconciled under dual control, a building fund tracked to the shilling, and a report your members can trust.