Ask AwraIQ about features, pricing, onboarding, login, integrations, security, demos, mobile apps, automation, reports, or support.
For professional services
Engagement budgets tracked against real cost, client money segregated and auditable, expenses and procurement governed, and the firm's assets on a proper register — the operational backbone under your practice.
If any of these ring true, you are exactly who this was built for.
The firm is full of work, yet nobody can say which engagements actually made money and which quietly ran at a loss.
Client and trust funds sit in the same mental space as operating cash — and an auditor or the regulator will ask you to prove they never mixed.
Disbursements, subscriptions, and office buying happen everywhere and reach finance only as a pile of receipts after the fact.
Laptops, servers, and library assets bought, moved, and written off — with a register that was accurate the day IT set it up.
Each capability links to a deeper feature tour.
Budget each engagement and track cost and disbursements against it, so you see the margin on the work while it is still live.
Client and restricted funds tracked separately from firm money, with every movement attributed — the segregation an auditor can verify in minutes.
Disbursements, subscriptions, and office buying flow through approvals and land on the right engagement, not a month-end pile.
Laptops, servers, and equipment with named custodians, movement history, and disposal records — findable and auditable.
Approval thresholds, segregation of duties, and attributable actions — the control environment your own audits demand of clients.
Engagement margins, expense against budget, fund positions, and asset reports — generated for partner meetings, not typed the night before.
Budget your live engagements and route disbursements and expenses to them — the first profitability report reframes the whole book of work.
Client and trust money tracked apart from operating cash, every movement attributed — the position defensible on demand.
IT and office registers, approval thresholds, and partner reporting — the operational backbone complete.
Law, audit, and consulting firms sell time — but still run on operations they never systematize: which engagements make money, whether client funds are separate, and where the firm's money goes.
Utilization tells you how busy your people are; profitability tells you whether it was worth it. In a firm that sells time, confusing them is how a fully-booked practice loses money.
Money a firm holds for clients is not the firm's money, and proving that at any moment is a professional obligation. What proper segregation of client and trust funds actually requires.
No — and we say so plainly. Practice-management and timesheet tools handle matters, time capture, and client billing; AWRA is the operational and financial backbone underneath — engagement profitability, fund segregation, expenses, procurement, and assets. The two coexist, and most firms keep the practice tool they already run and add AWRA for what it does not cover.
Client and restricted funds are tracked as their own segregated positions, distinct from operating cash, with every receipt and disbursement attributed to a person and a timestamp. That produces exactly what a regulator or auditor asks for — a defensible, verifiable record that client money was never commingled with the firm's.
Yes. You budget the engagement and track cost and disbursements against it as the work runs, so margin is visible while the engagement is still live — early enough to manage scope, staffing, or the client conversation, rather than discovering a loss after the final bill.
Small and mid-sized firms benefit most, because they rarely have a finance function large enough to track engagement profitability, fund segregation, and assets manually. Start with the discipline that hurts most — usually engagement costing or fund segregation — and extend from there.
See engagement profitability, segregated client funds, and governed expenses — the backbone under your practice.