The Cheque in the Drawer Is a Dated Risk
The short version, first
A cheque is not money and it is not a payment. It is a dated instruction that may or may not be honoured, and under the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 holding one carelessly has consequences: if you do not present it within a reasonable time of its issue and the drawer suffers actual damage through your delay, the drawer is discharged to that extent. Our records have one row for a payment and one date on it. A cheque carries three dates — the one written on it, the one you took it, and the one it cleared or came back — and it can end in a state our payments have no word for. The till cannot take one at all: the tender list is cash, mobile money and card.
In much of South Asia a cheque is still an ordinary way for a business customer to settle, and a post-dated cheque is an ordinary way to agree terms. That makes it a tender in the commercial sense and a promise in the legal one, and the gap between those two ideas is where systems get it wrong. A card payment either works or does not, at the counter, in a second. A cheque leaves with you, sits somewhere, and turns into money or into a problem days later — and the Act has quite a lot to say about the days in between.
Delay is the holder's problem
Section 84 is the provision worth knowing. Where a cheque is not presented for payment within a reasonable time of its issue, and the drawer had the right at the time presentment ought to have been made to have it paid, and suffers actual damage through the delay, the drawer is discharged to the extent of that damage. The section's own illustrations are about a bank failing between the day the cheque should have been presented and the day it was: in the first, the drawer had funds, the bank failed, and the drawer is discharged while the holder may prove against the bank instead.
What counts as a reasonable time is not a number. Section 84(2) says regard shall be had to the nature of the instrument, the usage of trade and of bankers, and the facts of the particular case. So the answer is contextual, and the only thing that makes it arguable in your favour is a record of when the cheque was issued, when you received it, and when you banked it.
One provision this post deliberately avoids
The penal consequence of a dishonoured cheque lives in section 141, and the same official site lists a Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2026 — Act No. 65 of 2026, dated 10 April 2026 — whose single substantive clause is an amendment of section 141. The amending text on that page is in Bengali. So everything cited here is drawn from provisions that amendment does not touch, and if your question is about the offence rather than about the instrument, that is the provision to have translated properly rather than read in a blog.
Three days, forty-eight hours, and the next post
The Act is full of small, precise periods, and they are worth seeing together because they are all about instruments rather than about invoices.
Four periods from the Act, and what each attaches to
The rule What it applies to, and what it does not
Three days of grace Maturity, section 22
Every promissory note or bill of exchange not expressed to be payable on demand, at sight or on presentment is at maturity on the third day after the day it is expressed to be payable. A cheque is payable on demand, so grace does not reach it — this one is for notes and bills.
The corresponding day Months after date, section 23
Where an instrument is payable a stated number of months after date, after sight or after an event, the period terminates on the day of the month corresponding with the day the instrument is dated. Month arithmetic by correspondence, not by day count.
Forty-eight hours The drawee's deliberation, section 63
The holder must, if required, allow the drawee of a bill presented for acceptance forty-eight hours exclusive of public holidays to decide whether to accept. A holiday-aware period, sitting in a nineteenth-century statute.
By the next post Notice of dishonour, section 106
Where the parties are in different places, notice is timely if despatched by the next post or on the day next after the day of dishonour. Where they are in the same place, if despatched in time to arrive on the day next after. The unit is a postal round.
Section 61 adds a fifth idea that is easy to miss: presentment for acceptance must be made in business hours on a business day, and where agreement or usage permits, presentment by registered letter through the post office is sufficient. A business day and a public holiday are both concepts this product already resolves — the working calendar knows the organization's week and its holidays — and neither is wired into anything on the payments path.
What a payment row can hold
A payment against a till sale in this product is four columns: the sale, a method from a fixed list of three — cash, mobile money, card — an amount, and a moment. A payment against a customer invoice is a little richer: its own reference number, a date, an amount, a method from a list of five, a free-text reference and notes. The list of five includes bank and includes other. It does not include cheque.
Which is a small thing to notice and a slightly odd one, because the expense record — money going out — carries a payment method whose own inline comment reads bank, cash, mobile money, cheque, card. A cheque is contemplated where we pay somebody and absent where somebody pays us. That is the sort of asymmetry that gets built by writing the two features a year apart, and it is the kind of thing worth spotting before a market that runs on cheques asks about it.
What a cheque carries, against what a payment row holds
| The fact | On a till payment | On an invoice payment | On an expense |
|---|---|---|---|
| The amount | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A tender type of cheque | No | No | Yes |
| A reference for the instrument | No | Yes | Yes |
| The date written on the instrument | No | No | No |
| The date it was received | Partly — configurable by you | Partly — configurable by you | Partly — configurable by you |
| The date it was presented or banked | No | No | No |
| A state meaning it came back unpaid | No | No | No |
| The drawer's bank and branch | No | No | No |
Built and maintained Configurable by you, not maintained by us Not built
Row five is the honest partial: each payment carries one date, and depending on how your team works that single date might mean the day the cheque was written, the day it arrived, or the day somebody keyed it in. Nothing distinguishes them, which means the one figure section 84 turns on — the interval between issue and presentment — cannot be produced from the record even approximately.
A card either works or does not, in a second, at the counter. A cheque is a promise with three dates on it, and our payment row has one column for all three.
Row seven is the other structural one. A payment in this product is a record of money received; it has no lifecycle. There is no state a payment can move into meaning the instrument came back unpaid, which means a dishonoured cheque is handled by deleting or adjusting the payment — and the moment you do that, the record that a cheque was ever taken, and when, disappears with it. That matters here more than usual, because section 106 starts a clock on the day of dishonour: notice must be despatched by the next post, or on the day after, or in time to arrive the day after if you are in the same town.
Two things in the product point the right way. The working calendar resolves the organization's own week and its public holidays, and answers both "is this a business day" and "which days are holidays" — which is precisely what sections 61 and 63 are written in. And a customer invoice payment already carries a free-text reference, which is where a cheque number goes today. What is absent is the tender type, the second and third dates, and a state to move to.
A cheque is a tender type and two more dates
These are small and they are ordered — the first is what the rest hang from.
Cheque as a tender type
On a till payment and on an invoice payment, matching the option the expense record already contemplates, so money in and money out describe the same world.
The instrument date and the banking date
Two nullable dates beside the amount, so the interval section 84 turns on is a subtraction rather than a recollection — and so a post-dated cheque is visibly not yet money.
A returned state on a payment
So a dishonour moves a record rather than removing one, and the fact that a cheque was taken on a date survives its failure.
The drawer's bank and branch
Two fields that make a returned cheque followable and make a concentration of risk in one bank visible.
The first two are the build and they are a day's work each. The third is the one that changes behaviour, because it turns a deletion into a history. The fourth is optional and pays for itself the first time a bank fails or a customer's cheques start bouncing in a pattern.
Tell us what your operation needsFour questions for a system taking cheques
How do you record a cheque?
What you will probably hear
As a bank payment with the number in the reference.
How to read it
Workable and lossy. Ask whether the tender type distinguishes a cheque from a transfer, because a transfer is money and a cheque is a promise, and treating them as one means your cash position includes instruments that have not cleared.
What date is on the payment?
What you will probably hear
The date it was received.
How to read it
Ask what the team actually enters, which is often the date on the cheque, and sometimes the date of keying. One column cannot carry three meanings. If you are exposed to a delay rule, the interval between issue and banking is the number you will be asked for.
Show me a cheque that bounced.
What you will probably hear
We reverse the payment.
How to read it
Then the history goes with it. Ask whether a payment can move into a returned state that keeps its original dates, because a reversal leaves you unable to show that you banked it promptly — which is the only defence a delay rule leaves you.
Can a receipt be dated in the future?
What you will probably hear
You would enter it when it clears.
How to read it
Which means a post-dated cheque is invisible until then, and the receivable looks unsettled while an instrument for it sits in a drawer. Ask whether a receipt can be scheduled, because that is the same missing shape as an instalment schedule and it is one table for both.
What AWRA OpsHub does today
- Several payments against one document, each with its own amount, date and method, on both till sales and customer invoices.
- A reference and notes on an invoice payment, which is where a cheque number and a bank name go today.
- A payment reference number of its own, unique per organization, on every invoice payment.
- A cheque contemplated on money going out, in the expense record's payment method alongside bank, cash, mobile money and card.
- A working calendar that resolves business days and public holidays, from the organization's configured week and its own holiday list.
- Currency held per document, with figures rendered at each currency's own precision and unlike currencies disclosed rather than summed.
- A full audit trail on the records involved, writing the actor, the moment and the values that changed.
More we can add to your workspace
- Cheque as a tender type on money coming in, at the till and against an invoice, matching the option the expense record already lists.
- The date written on the instrument, as its own field, distinct from the date the payment was recorded.
- The date a cheque was presented or banked, which is the second half of the interval a delay rule turns on.
- A returned state on a payment, so a dishonour moves the record forward and keeps its dates rather than removing it.
- The drawer's bank and branch on a receipt, making a returned instrument followable and a concentration of risk visible.
- A scheduled receipt, so a post-dated cheque is a dated expectation rather than nothing until it clears.
- Business-day arithmetic on the payments path, using the working calendar that the support and workflow clocks already run on.
Where we point you to a specialist
- We will not tell you what a reasonable time to present a cheque is. Section 84(2) sends the question to the nature of the instrument, the usage of trade and of bankers, and the facts of the case — which is a local banking-practice question with a bank's own rules layered on top. What software should do is make the two dates easy to record so the interval is a fact rather than an argument.
- We will not advise on the offence. The penal dishonour provision is section 141, the same official site records a 2026 Act amending it, and the amending text is in Bengali. We read the provisions that amendment does not touch and stopped there, which is the honest boundary of what a vendor should be telling you about somebody else's criminal law.
- We hold a position on reversing a payment, and it is that a dishonour should move a record rather than delete one. A reversal is tidy in the ledger and destroys the evidence that you took the instrument on a particular day and banked it on another — and where a delay rule exists, that evidence is the whole of your position. A quotation from us for this work adds a state rather than a delete.
The first three are one afternoon between them: an option on two enums and two nullable dates beside the amount. The fourth is the one worth arguing for, because it turns a deletion into a history and nothing else on the list is much use without it. The fifth is two fields. The sixth is the same scheduled-receipt table an instalment plan needs, so if both matter to you they are one build rather than two. The seventh is a call into a service that already exists.
Tell us which of your tenders are promises
A tender list that mixes instruments with settlements will always overstate your cash, and the fix is a type and two dates rather than a feature. We looked at money as pieces rather than amounts in <a href="/blog/forty-dollars-in-two-dollar-coins">Forty Dollars in Two-Dollar Coins</a>; this is the other half of the same problem, where the tender is not money yet at all. The missing scheduled receipt is the same table an instalment plan needs — <a href="/blog/nine-things-before-the-customer-signs">Nine Things Before the Customer Signs</a> has that side of it.
Talk to us about your workspace